It’s in Weinreich also as khosn. So no differentiation between samekh and sin?
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 4:34 PM Heidi G Lerner via Heb-naco < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Caroline My thought is that based on our current of HCM, I would > romanize it as "Aḥosn" "Use Weinreich and Niborski as guides for > romanization of vowels and most consonants. However, differentiate between > כ/ח and תּ/ט, כּ/ק > Hi Caroline > > My thought is that based on our current of HCM, I would romanize it as > "Aḥosn" > > > "Use Weinreich and Niborski as guides for romanization of vowels and most > consonants. *However, differentiate between כ/ח and תּ/ט, כּ/ק with the > underscore dots and transcribe final ה with an “h.” When Weinreich offers a > choice of romanizations, the first is adopted*. *If a Hebrew two-word > expression is written as two words in a Yiddish context, this spacing is > imitated in the romanization.* Hebrew Script Weinreich Niborski ALA-LC > Romanization טוב יום YONTEV/YONTEF יאָנטעװ yon ṭev Kiper Yin > יאָנקיפּער/יאָמקיפּער YONKIPER/YINKIPER יום כיפור הסופר עזרא -- -- Ezra > ha-Soyfer. > > I could not locate "חתן" in Weinrich so I went to Niborski. > > Just my thoughts. > > best, Heidi > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Heb-naco <[email protected]> on behalf of Miller, > Caroline via Heb-naco <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 27, 2023 9:36 AM > *To:* HEB-NACO List Posting ([email protected]) < > [email protected]> > *Subject:* [Heb-NACO] Yiddish romanization question > > All, I have a Yiddish literary work published in Vilna in 1897. The first > word in the title is אחתן with patah under א, kamats under both ח and ת. > The copy I see for a later edition romanizes it as “Aḥos̀n” but I don’t > know how the nikud appeared > > All, > > > > I have a Yiddish literary work published in Vilna in 1897. The first word > in the title is אחתן with patah under א, kamats under both ח and ת. > > > > The copy I see for a later edition romanizes it as “Aḥos̀n” but I don’t > know how the nikud appeared on that piece. Wouldn’t my piece be romanized > “Aḥos̀on?” because of the two successively appearing kamatsim? > > > > Wishing you all a happy Sukkot! > > > > Caroline > > > > *Caroline R. Miller* > > Team Leader, Discovery Team > > UCLA Library Resource Acquisitions and Metadata Services > > 2400 Life Sciences Building > > 621 Charles E Young Drive South > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.google.com/maps/search/621*Charles*E*Young*Drive*South?entry=gmail&source=g__;KysrKys!!KGKeukY!19GzUxkN9pRcoQjc6E7N876yHnkn6t8jCwxeyMF3WUs4HIrk-A0PnshMzbGKL6AVhDF0DktAzDQqFY8X8BGsGS8dv4EW9Ok$ > > > > Box 957230 > > Los Angeles, CA 90095-7230 > > > _______________________________________________ > Heb-naco mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco >
_______________________________________________ Heb-naco mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco
