On Wed, 2016-11-30 at 11:38 -0800, Henry B (Hank) Hotz, CISSP wrote:
> Did I miss a 7.0 release? Also why does 7.0.1rcX automatically become
No. Apparently the next real release will be 7.1, and they're spelling
"7.1 release candidate 1" as "7.0.1". I'm not sure what the thinking
is behind this odd numbering scheme. It would be a whole lot easier to
understand if the first RC were 7.0rc1 and the first real release were
> While I’m asking, why are we renaming 1.7 as 7.x?
Good question. I look forward to hearing the answer.