Non-numeric version numbers are not portable.

On 11/30/2016 6:00 PM, Henry B (Hank) Hotz, CISSP wrote:
> So it’s no longer possible to have non-numeric version numbers?
> 
> Please understand, I don’t really care. The new system is logical enough, 
> even if unconventional. Just wondering what the actual reason was.
> 
>> On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:02 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount <qua...@symas.com> wrote:
>>
>> --On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 2:56 PM -0500 Jeffrey Hutzelman 
>> <jh...@cmu.edu> wrote:
>>> Good question.  I look forward to hearing the answer.
>>
>> All of this was already discussed in the 10/19/2016 email from Roland 
>> Dowdeswell email with the subject "Preparing for the Heimdal 7 Release".
>>
>> <http://www.h5l.org/pipermail/heimdal-discuss/2016-October/000048.html>
>>
>> --Quanah
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Quanah Gibson-Mount
>> Product Architect
>> Symas Corporation
>> Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP:
>> <http://www.symas.com>
>>
> 
> Personal email.  hbh...@oxy.edu
> 
> 
> 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to