On 4.4.2012 13:57, Jiri Svoboda wrote: > I really don't want to discourage you, just warn you that the > networking stack is still not in such good shape as you might be > thinking. I suggest it might be better if you either come up with > another idea or at least modify your proposal in such way to be less > dependent on networking. I would not want to end up in a situation > where you could not progress because I haven't finished some part of > the network stack just yet :-( After all, I am working on in in my > spare time - and this is very scarce sometimes.
I would not be that much against a project like this (with preferences towards SSH). Sure, such a project would be very much a bleeding edge one thanks to the bleeding edge networking stack (both versions), but on the other hand, the TCP part is already rewritten and it can handle normal traffic. The proposal could be modified so that whenever there occurs a roadblock in the form of a buggy networking stack, the proposal would redirect the student to help debug and fix the problem. From this point of view, it would make sense to work with the new stack only. How about that? Jakub _______________________________________________ HelenOS-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.modry.cz/cgi-bin/listinfo/helenos-devel
