Hey, I've got cfengine 2.1.10 running on a couple of Debian machines here. Not all are running 24/7 (the workstations). The usual thing.
Everything is fine. I'm just a bit confused about cfrun's output if a host is unrechable. Example: 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/mbunkus$ cfrun ls-bs-ws3 cfrun(0): .......... [ Hailing ls-bs-ws3.bs.linet-services.de ] .......... cfrun:ls-bs-si2.bs.linet-services.de: Couldn't open a socket cfrun:ls-bs-si2.bs.linet-services.de: socket: No route to host ls-bs-ws3 is indeed down, but why does cfrun use ls-bs-si2... as the host name in this case? This gets even more confusing when I run cfrun without any argument and it iterates through all hosts in cfrun.hosts. For each unreachable host it just prints the two lines shown above, and I have no clue whatsoever which hosts are actually down. So. Is this the intended behaviour? If yes, then why (probably because I don't fully understand how cfengine works; but that information above is useless and misleading)? If not, has this bug been fixed already? The ChangeLog for 2.1.13 does not mention anything in that direction, and I don't really want to install from source only for trying, and the packages in Debian/testing are at 2.1.10. Thanks for your help. Moritz -- LINET Services GbR Gotenweg 15 Tel.: 0531-280 191 71 38106 Braunschweig Fax.: 0531-280 191 72 http://www.linet-services.de [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpF8IUALyGTa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Help-cfengine mailing list Help-cfengine@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine