No route to host = firewall? M
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 10:59 +0100, Moritz Bunkus wrote: > Hey, > > I've got cfengine 2.1.10 running on a couple of Debian machines > here. Not all are running 24/7 (the workstations). The usual thing. > > Everything is fine. I'm just a bit confused about cfrun's output if a > host is unrechable. Example: > > 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/mbunkus$ cfrun ls-bs-ws3 > cfrun(0): .......... [ Hailing > ls-bs-ws3.bs.linet-services.de ] .......... > cfrun:ls-bs-si2.bs.linet-services.de: Couldn't open a socket > cfrun:ls-bs-si2.bs.linet-services.de: socket: No route to host > > ls-bs-ws3 is indeed down, but why does cfrun use ls-bs-si2... as the > host name in this case? This gets even more confusing when I run cfrun > without any argument and it iterates through all hosts in > cfrun.hosts. For each unreachable host it just prints the two lines > shown above, and I have no clue whatsoever which hosts are actually > down. > > So. Is this the intended behaviour? If yes, then why (probably because I > don't fully understand how cfengine works; but that information above is > useless and misleading)? If not, has this bug been fixed already? The > ChangeLog for 2.1.13 does not mention anything in that direction, and I > don't really want to install from source only for trying, and the > packages in Debian/testing are at 2.1.10. > > Thanks for your help. > > Moritz > > _______________________________________________ > Help-cfengine mailing list > Help-cfengine@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine _______________________________________________ Help-cfengine mailing list Help-cfengine@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine