> From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > rg] On Behalf Of Neil J Mackie > Sent: Thursday 05 May 2005 1:01 pm > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [h-e-w] Fwd: Re: Control frame size on startup > from .emacs > > _Any_ automated procedure is unacceptable in a corporate > environment, as is _any_ use of the registry. > > Can anyone contribute how emacs is being officially developed > on the Windows platform and whether the use of the registry > and installation scripts are sanctioned or not? > > I dont want to prevent progress, or be critical of well > intentioned effort, but I do want to continue to use emacs on > a daily basis at work. > > Regards, > Neil (J Mackie).
I don't think there is really a problem. NTEmacs is just GNU Emacs compiled as a native Windows application. As far as I'm aware, NTEmacs has read the registry for a long time (probably as long as it has existed), but it doesn't write to the registry, and I can't see off hand why it would ever need to. It's addpm that writes to the registry, but running addpm is optional (and has been for some time). NTEmacs uses registry values if they are there, but doesn't care if they are not. The GNU Emacs source code will be freely available for the foreseeable future. So, even if various precompiled, prepackaged versions are available, it will always be possible to compile from source and ignore the packaging. Francis
