> Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 16:28:15 -0400 > From: Nat Goodspeed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: help-emacs-windows@gnu.org > > For me, the clincher is cygwin's X server.
Then why do you use the native Windows port of Emacs? The Cygwin port is a faithful emulation of Emacs compiled with the X toolkit, and will avoid any problems with Cygwin vs native executables. > When I run my remote emacs in a cygwin X window, > though, it's nearly as powerful as my local NT emacs. Why ``nearly''? what is missing? > C-M-F10 seems to get eaten I'm guessing that this is a problem with the X server, not with Emacs.
