On 16:18, Lorenzo Bettini wrote: > >This not only avoids future compatiblility issues with other > >implementations of getopt, but also gives us the freedom to change > >things at will rather than having to rely on a standard which simply > >doesn't cover things like multiple parsers or a non-constant argv. > > yes but my only concern is that any future updates/addition to getopt > implementation must be adapted by hand to the customized version...
If we don't use the system's getopt any longer, we don't have to care about this ;) > time will tell ;-) Yes, lets first see if this version works for everybody, it sure works for me. Andre -- The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe _______________________________________________ Help-gengetopt mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gengetopt
