Andre Noll wrote:
On 16:18, Lorenzo Bettini wrote:


This not only avoids future compatiblility issues with other
implementations of getopt, but also gives us the freedom to change
things at will rather than having to rely on a standard which simply
doesn't cover things like multiple parsers or a non-constant argv.

yes but my only concern is that any future updates/addition to getopt implementation must be adapted by hand to the customized version...


If we don't use the system's getopt any longer, we don't have to care
about this ;)


well actually that's the problem: any improvement to the system's getopt will have to be included manually in our version :-)


time will tell ;-)


Yes, lets first see if this version works for everybody, it sure works
for me.

GREAT! :-)

Lorenzo

--
+-----------------------------------------------------+
|  Lorenzo Bettini          ICQ# lbetto, 16080134     |
|  PhD in Computer Science                            |
|  Dip. Sistemi e Informatica, Univ. di Firenze       |
|  Florence - Italy        (GNU/Linux User # 158233)  |
|  Home Page        : http://www.lorenzobettini.it    |
|  http://music.dsi.unifi.it         XKlaim language  |
|  http://www.purplesucker.com Deep Purple Cover Band |
|  http://www.gnu.org/software/src-highlite           |
|  http://www.gnu.org/software/gengetopt              |
|  http://www.lorenzobettini.it/software/gengen       |
|  http://www.lorenzobettini.it/software/doublecpp    |
+-----------------------------------------------------+


_______________________________________________
Help-gengetopt mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gengetopt

Reply via email to