On 14:46, Lorenzo Bettini wrote: > A situation like the one you describes implicitly requires mutually > exclusive groups (not groups of mutually exclusive options), i.e., the > program accepts two different (or more than two) mutually exclusive > syntaxes (besides a possibly common options). And probably the best > thing would be to add such features.
Yes, that would be _very_ useful. There are many programs that have "general" options such as --verbose as well as "subcommand" options (like Papp Gyozo's --init, --attach), each of which requires its own set of options. Regards Andre -- The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Help-gengetopt mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gengetopt
