Gyozo Papp wrote:
> nice to hear about the new gengetopt version.
> I kindly ask what's about this groupoption refactoring?
It sounds great. do not misunderstand me!
I don't know if we agreed on a clear solution. Did we?
We were talking about it would be great if groups can be mutually
exclusive and one can define default option(s) from a specfic group as
if it was declaered at the commandline (in case of any other mutually
exlusive option is missing). Something like that?
that's one feature.. then we were discussing of having mutually
exclusive groups besides groups of mutually exclusive options.
However, I'll take a look at the previous emails, since I might not
remember well due to my seaside holiday ;-)
cheers
Lorenzo
--
Lorenzo Bettini, PhD in Computer Science, DSI, Univ. di Firenze
ICQ# lbetto, 16080134 (GNU/Linux User # 158233)
HOME: http://www.lorenzobettini.it MUSIC: http://www.purplesucker.com
BLOGS: http://tronprog.blogspot.com http://longlivemusic.blogspot.com
http://www.gnu.org/software/src-highlite
http://www.gnu.org/software/gengetopt
http://www.gnu.org/software/gengen http://doublecpp.sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
Help-gengetopt mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gengetopt
