On 09:18, Lorenzo Bettini wrote: > >and for the type punning question, I preferred not to pass a void ** > >pointer (I zero the pointer outside the function). > > > >Could you please check this version? I tried to recreate your compiler > >command line arguments so that I got the warnings too; now, with make > >check, I don't get warnings anymore... > > > > anyone tried this?
Yes, I just tried it, and I can confirm that the code generated by this gengetopt version doesn't cause gcc to spit out the type punning warnings. Thanks a lot, Lorenzo Andre -- The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Help-gengetopt mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gengetopt
