On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 04:41:13PM +0100, David Squire wrote: > Wolfgang Müller wrote: > >>just wondering if anyone has had a chance to try out my optimized feature > >>extractor yet. > >> > > > >Sorry, still trying to catch up on sleep after a tough weekend. > > > >I was just wanting to ask David: Did you look at it? Do you want to do it? > > > Not yet. I would like to, but I can't make it first priority at present. > If it's byte-compatible and faster, then I say go with it. It would be > good to get it tested on a variety of systems though (esp. 64 bit). >
agreed. testing is certainy in order. > In any case, I would prefer to see a set-up where it is easy to select > from a variety of feature extractors, rather than have this clobber the > legacy Viper code (esp. since IIRC there are cases when this is *not* > faster). sorry about that. thats my own fault. in testing with your origional PPM library, i discovered this program runs at "full speed" when i forget all my SSE2 flags. i've basically been optimizing the code to run on a "small cache, large CPU, deep pipeline" system. such as my P4. ;) so, again, i THINK this runs at the faster speed on lower end hardware. but i havent the hardware to test. ;) > > Sorry about this, but I am deep in Perl and MySQL with Damocles at present. > > Regards, > > David > > > -- > Dr David McG. Squire, Senior Lecturer, on sabbatical in 2006 > Caulfield School of Information Technology, Monash University, Australia > CRICOS Provider No. 00008C http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~davids/ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > help-GIFT mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gift _______________________________________________ help-GIFT mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gift
