On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 10:21:55AM +0200, Wolfgang Müller wrote: > Well I just thought about it. The pipe only solution would be nice, because > one could distribute that in no time.
distributing over clusters using pipes does function better than using sockets. (in the clusters i use). however, even tho i'm clustering this, i think the "stream of URLs" approach is more appropriate. while PPM has a header structure we can pick up in a simple enough manner, seperating the .fts files we output might be interesting batch mode, and pipes seem mutually exclusive, or that if we do impliment it that way, i think it will get very ugly quickly. i also think it should be "standard practice" to sed/awk up the URL output of this program, rather than add 30 command line arguments. ;) Julia Longtin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ help-GIFT mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gift
