On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 05:49:11PM +0200, Wolfgang Müller wrote: > On Wednesday 03 May 2006 17:41, David Squire wrote: > > In any case, I would prefer to see a set-up where it is easy to select > > from a variety of feature extractors, > > Well, who would not prefer this. Currently we have someone contributing code > and kicking us and we even have trouble finding the time to look at the > contribution. Do you think it looks serious if we make bigger plans at the > current situation? This might sound harsh, but I am just stating facts. > > > rather than have this clobber the > > legacy Viper code (esp. since IIRC there are cases when this is *not* > > faster). > > As I understood, this was an assumption, and the Julia's most recent mail > said > that it was not the case. Correct, Julia?
as stated in another email, yep. my assumption, my fault. did everything i could to SSE2 optimize the thing, but failed. instead, it appears i'm cache/pipeline optimizing. as the code runs the same on a compiler that dosent have the sse2 tricks. i still might be wrong. however. thats why we need testing. eyeballs that arent mine. programmers can be nearsighted. ;) Julia Longtin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ help-GIFT mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gift
