On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 09:06:39PM +0100, Wolfgang Mueller wrote: > Dear Julia, > I think I got all the patches now, and things did *not* work correctly > so far. The trouble is that in gabor.c some values get negative. As > small negatives are LARGE positives we get nice segfaults. If I hack > things that the loop is skipped when the corresponding values are > negative things run through nicely. I still have too look more deeply in > the ramifications of this (bug by David or bug by you or bug by me??), > then I'll put patches to the discussion. > > Currently I am indexing 6k personal photos :-) and then I will see if > things work as nicely as they seemed to on a 500 image collection. > > Cheers, > Wolfgang > -- > Dr. Wolfgang Mueller > LS Medieninformatik > Universitaet Bamberg Wolfgang:
i'm still reviewing the last patch to make it work on my machine.. basically, if in gabor.c, if you change either the x or the y variable from a uint32_t to a uint64_t, it starts magically working. no, i've no idea. i'm still fighting this one. but after that, it magically starts working, on my machine. Julia Longtin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ help-GIFT mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gift
