On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 08:20:10AM +0100, Wolfgang Mueller wrote: > > Wolfgang: > > > > i'm still reviewing the last patch to make it work on my machine.. > > > > basically, if in gabor.c, if you change either the x or the y variable from > > a uint32_t to a uint64_t, it starts magically working. > > > > no, i've no idea. i'm still fighting this one. but after that, it magically > > starts working, on my machine. > I am a fan of printouts. And my printouts tell me that some index is > getting negative, and the reason why makes sense. So my hunch is, that > if it works magically is that some overflow plays into our hands. But > this does not make the multiplication result correct. > > Cheers, > Wolfgang > -- > Dr. Wolfgang Mueller > LS Medieninformatik > Universitaet Bamberg
You and I are getting different results. You're using whats in CVS, and the one line change i mentioned in the last mail, right? i used to run into something that sounds like your bug, but i dont remember the details, its been months since i messed with it. personally, i break things, then valgrind them to death. i'll let you know when i have progress with this. Julia Longtin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ help-GIFT mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gift
