Hi Al. On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 01:57:09PM -0500, al davis wrote: > The functionality of the gnucap-conf script needs to be included > in the main line, but 50,000 lines of autotools is too high a > price for that 10 line script.
yes. when i wrote the first gnucap-conf, autotools existed in the main line -- and it was simplest to just use it. i don't seem to have time for a rewrite, regardless of the number of lines. > What would it take to make gnucap-adms work with gnucap???? for the most part, it should "work". i haven't tried for a while. from what i remember, issues include (order of precendence): - the build somehow depends on gnucap-conf, but maybe shouldn't. apart from this, it compiles against gnucap (with a lot of unrelated warnings that i am trying to get rid of). - i am not sure about run time issues related to library paths. this shouldn't be a big deal. - the test suite does not properly work without gnucap-uf. if it did, it would report lots of FAILs related to -uf changes and incomplete hacks. these need to be adressed individually... - the load_va command is based on experimental gnucap-uf load hacks/experiments/additions. this command is not essential. cheers felix _______________________________________________ Help-gnucap mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnucap
