jsju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does anyone knows what 'in-charge' and 'not-in-charge' means?
It's an internal impelementation detail, which should not be of any concern to you. > This happens a lot when I compile stuff. It doesn't. It may happen when you *link* stuff. > example: > > g++ -o qtext viewer.o main.o ... > main.o: In function `Viewer::Viewer[not-in-charge]()': > main.o(.text+0x0): multiple definition of > `Viewer::Viewer[not-in-charge]()' > viewer.o(.text+0x0): first defined here > main.o: In function `Viewer::Viewer[in-charge]()': Your code is improperly structured: the Viewer::Viewer() is *defined* in both viewer.o and main.o, but your intention was probably to define it in only in viewer.o. Cheers, -- In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion. Remove /-nsp/ for email. _______________________________________________ Help-gplusplus mailing list Help-gplusplus@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gplusplus
