Ulrich Eckhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Paul Pluzhnikov wrote: >> It's an internal impelementation detail ... > > I'd be interested to know anyways, you don't have a link handy, do you?
This comment in gcc-4.1-20051022/gcc/cp/decl2.c explains: /* Constructors for types with virtual baseclasses need an "in-charge" flag saying whether this constructor is responsible for initialization of virtual baseclasses or not. All destructors also need this "in-charge" flag, which additionally determines whether or not the destructor should free the memory for the object. ... Cheers, -- In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion. Remove /-nsp/ for email. _______________________________________________ Help-gplusplus mailing list Help-gplusplus@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gplusplus