Adam Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well at any rate it's the mangled version of RootClass: > > plugin.so: undefined symbol: _ZN8RootClassC2Ev
Hmm. Are you (mis)typing this instead of cut/pasting? The '_ZN8RootClassC2Ev' is not a valid mangled symbol at all; the '_ZN9RootClassC2Ev' is "RootClass::RootClass[not-in-charge]()" constructor. >> If that's what you did, please try to construct a trivial compilable >> example, and provide *exact* compile and link lines and gcc and OS >> versions. > > If this is unexpected behaviour I'll see if I can do that. Yes, this is unexpected. You should begin by running 'nm Main | grep RootClass' and verifying that there is a definition of this constructor in Main to begin with (if there isn't, -rdynamic wouldn't make a difference -- you can't export what's not defined). Cheers, -- In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion. Remove /-nsp/ for email. _______________________________________________ Help-gplusplus mailing list Help-gplusplus@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gplusplus
