Adam Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The constructor is implemented in the main executable, e.g. > > g++ -o main Main.o RootClass.o > > But I imagine it's the same situation.
Actually, it isn't. There is a big difference between linking RootClass.o and linking libmumble.a; you can read all about it here: http://webpages.charter.net/ppluzhnikov/linker.html What Robert meant to tell you is that the librarian may not take RootClass.o "fook" from the libmumble.a "shelf" at all (if none of the RootClass.o code is referenced by any of your other objects). But of course, your mistake was even simpler :) > Is there a way I can link things so this code would be included? The way you are doing it is fine (provided RootClass.o contains the necessary code). Cheers, -- In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion. Remove /-nsp/ for email. _______________________________________________ Help-gplusplus mailing list Help-gplusplus@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gplusplus
