F.J.K. wrote: > Boris wrote: >> I had created a small test case but unfortunately it worked. The >> project I port is too large - it would take some time to track this >> down which I don't have currently. > > Is the bug present in GCC 4.x? > in mainline?
I don't know, I didn't try yet. For now I'm happy if I can work around the bug and finally release the software on Linux. > Is there any reason you can't just do? (Real question, not just > rhetorical :-) > > #ifdef __GNUC__ && __GNU__<4 > #define dynamic_cast static_cast > #endif Yes, I use something like this now: #if defined(__GNUC__) const level1 &l1 = *static_range<const level1*>(&base); #else const level1 &l1 = dynamic_cast<const level1&>(base); #endif >> From what I take from the discussion so far, you have assured your >> code > is semantically correct (See Pete Beckers guru-posting). At this I'm as much sure as you can be with C++ code. ;-) What's 100% for sure though is that everything works when linked statically. Boris _______________________________________________ help-gplusplus mailing list help-gplusplus@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gplusplus
