Hi > The warning is useful because, if your class holds dynamically > allocated resources, the default copy constructor and copy assignment > operator generated by the compiler won't be appropriate.
Yes. But noncopyable should define that, isn't it? Means that I do not want to copy objects. > For this kind > of classes you must define what "copying" means, to deal with the > "shared resource" problem. I know that I have to define, but I assume, that noncopyable did it. Thanks and regards. Seweryn Habdank-Wojewodzki. _______________________________________________ help-gplusplus mailing list help-gplusplus@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gplusplus