On Aug 25, 6:53 pm, Seweryn Habdank-Wojewódzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > > The warning is useful because, if your class holds dynamically > > allocated resources, the default copy constructor and copy assignment > > operator generated by the compiler won't be appropriate. > > Yes. But noncopyable should define that, isn't it? Means that I do not > want to copy objects.
"noncopyable" is not a special keyword known by the compiler. It's just a class with private copy constructor and copy assignment operator. You missed my first paragraph: "(...) assuming you are using boost::noncopyable appropriately, it means the diagnostic mechanism is not detecting that, in this case, your class simply isn't copyable." -- Pedro Lamarão _______________________________________________ help-gplusplus mailing list help-gplusplus@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gplusplus
