At Sun, 24 May 2009 16:04:07 -0400, Michael Braun wrote: > FAIL: random-libc5, ratio of int to double (1.45346 observed vs > 1.66301 expected) [107] > FAIL: test > > So I'm not sure if this is a feature or a bug (or something I'm doing > wrong). Any ideas?
Do you see the same failure if the library is compiled without optimisation (or with a lower level, e.g. the standard -O2)? Those tests certainly pass on other 64 bit platforms so I would suspect a problem with the optimisation. -- Brian Gough (GSL Maintainer) Support freedom by joining the FSF http://www.fsf.org/associate/support_freedom/join_fsf?referrer=37 _______________________________________________ Help-gsl mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gsl
