Brian:
I switched the -fast flag to -O2, and it worked. Is this possibly a
bug in GCC or GSL, or is it just life with optimized code?
Michael
On May 26, 2009, at 9:32 AM, Brian Gough wrote:
At Sun, 24 May 2009 16:04:07 -0400,
Michael Braun wrote:
FAIL: random-libc5, ratio of int to double (1.45346 observed vs
1.66301 expected) [107]
FAIL: test
So I'm not sure if this is a feature or a bug (or something I'm doing
wrong). Any ideas?
Do you see the same failure if the library is compiled without
optimisation (or with a lower level, e.g. the standard -O2)? Those
tests certainly pass on other 64 bit platforms so I would suspect a
problem with the optimisation.
--
Brian Gough
(GSL Maintainer)
Support freedom by joining the FSF
http://www.fsf.org/associate/support_freedom/join_fsf?referrer=37
-------------------------------------------
Michael Braun
Homer A. Burnell Career Development Professor, and
Assistant Professor of Management Science (Marketing Group)
MIT Sloan School of Management
One Amherst St., E40-169
Cambridge, MA 02142
[email protected]
617-253-3436
_______________________________________________
Help-gsl mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gsl
