On Mon, 14 May 2018 13:20:48 +0200 Ricardo Wurmus <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> writes: > > >> You should not package ghc-array, ghc-containers, or ghc-binary — these > >> are all provided by GHC itself. It is possible that there are some more > >> packages for which this applies (possibly including semigroupoids). > > > > Oops, I pushed ghc-array and ghc-containers just yesterday. Should I > > revert? > > Yes, these packages better should not exist. You can revert the commits > adding them and modify the package definitions of whatever new packages > refer to them. > > We removed them some time ago when we cleaned up and updated most of the > Haskell packages. > > -- > Ricardo > > Hi, I saw this message yesterday and thought I'd change and fix my patches, but had other things at that time. I should have sent a short message to the bug containing the patches. I'm going to clean up and send new patches without the ghc-array and so on. (I tested several of the requirements/dependencies and I think I isolated what needs to be declared).
pgpgjkBM_ZsLY.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
