On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 08:49:23PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > This is incorrect behavior for netfs_attempt_unlink. There is nothing > wrong with unlinking a node that still has other references, and if > this is done, you must not actually free any storage until all the > references go away. (That is, other users that have the file open > must have it continue to work as before.)
Ok, so it's much more simple than I thought. :) However, generally speaking, is there a way to make sure that operations on the server side are performed in the same order than on the client side? Thanks for your help and explanations, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Help-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd
