Ludovic Court�s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 08:49:23PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > This is incorrect behavior for netfs_attempt_unlink. There is nothing > > wrong with unlinking a node that still has other references, and if > > this is done, you must not actually free any storage until all the > > references go away. (That is, other users that have the file open > > must have it continue to work as before.) > > Ok, so it's much more simple than I thought. :) > > However, generally speaking, is there a way to make sure that operations on > the server side are performed in the same order than on the client side?
Yes, by not issuing the next client request until the server has replied to the first message. _______________________________________________ Help-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd
