Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 11:10:35PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote: > > > /hurd/iso9660fs.statis --multi-boot-command yada,yada,yada > > > /hurd/ld.so.1 /hurd/exec > > > bye > > > > This is weird. Is /hurd/exec on the fs. Is there a /server/* ? Attach > > gdb to the fs. to see what it its loading. > > Well, one thing that happens in the boot procedure is that exec is attached > to the /servers/exec node. This might only work on filesystems with write > support. In other words: there might be gaps in iso9660fs's support for the > bootstrap procedure.
Why is writing required? Is that a requirement for setting a active translator? (That is, IIRC, what libdiskfs does). (I always had the idea that I can set a translator on any node I own) If it really isn't possible what is the right way to fix this? Is this a bug that should be mentioned in the BTS? Thanks, Marco _______________________________________________ Help-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd
