On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 07:34:11PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote: > Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 11:10:35PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote: > > > > /hurd/iso9660fs.statis --multi-boot-command yada,yada,yada > > > > /hurd/ld.so.1 /hurd/exec > > > > bye > > > > > > This is weird. Is /hurd/exec on the fs. Is there a /server/* ? Attach > > > gdb to the fs. to see what it its loading. > > > > Well, one thing that happens in the boot procedure is that exec is attached > > to the /servers/exec node. This might only work on filesystems with write > > support. In other words: there might be gaps in iso9660fs's support for the > > bootstrap procedure. > > Why is writing required? Is that a requirement for setting a active > translator? (That is, IIRC, what libdiskfs does). > > (I always had the idea that I can set a translator on any node I own) > > If it really isn't possible what is the right way to fix this? Is > this a bug that should be mentioned in the BTS?
You make it sound as if I were sure. But I said "might" for a reason: I am just guessing around, to give inspirations about what to look out for. Thanks, Marcus -- `Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU http://www.gnu.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marcus Brinkmann The Hurd http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de/ _______________________________________________ Help-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd
