Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <n.mavrogiannopou...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi, > The license included in libidn2 COPYING is the GPLv3 license, whereas > the library seems to be dual LGPLv3+GPLv2 licensed according to: > https://gitlab.com/jas/libidn2/commit/17c93028c86ed12599a5a18995ccd25892f5e68e > > That most likely would prompt distributors to mark the library as > gplv3 (in fact fedora marks it as such), even though it is not. > > I think it would be more clear if the COPYING of LGPLv3 and GPLv2 were > also included as with libidn library.
Hi. Good point, done in: https://gitlab.com/jas/libidn2/commit/cb5a252a0cf5151df5421aa3d74be2bbf33232c9?expand_all_diffs=1 /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Help-libidn mailing list Help-libidn@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-libidn
