%% Noel Yap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ny> Really? I had thought:
ny> %.pm %_wrap.cc: %.swg ny> $(SwigAction) ny> was equivalent to: ny> %.pm: %.swg ny> $(SwigAction) ny> %_wrap.cc: %.swg ny> $(SwigAction) No. That's true for explicit rules but pattern rules have a different behavior. ny> My tests suggest this isn't true. If you confirm, it sounds like ny> GNU make already has the functionality I want. You don't need to test it, just read about pattern rules in the GNU make manual :). -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist _______________________________________________ Help-make mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-make
