Boris Kolpackov wrote: > > "Paul D. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > That might be true, but Lisp is really a very good language for a make > > scripting language, since much of make's behavior, at least in terms of > > expansion of variables, etc. is somewhat Lisp-like already. > > Just a thought: rather than adding a lisp-like language to make wouldn't > it be easier to implement make-like inference system in lisp? > > Comments?
The meat of make is rule-based so I would think that replacing this with a functional programming language would not be a good thing. MTC, Noel -- NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender. Sender does not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited. _______________________________________________ Help-make mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-make
