But there is one more thing: doing what you proposed would introduce a
completely new style of writing makefiles into my project, and I'd be
happy not to do this.
I'd be very happy to defer the call to SET instead of doing the
assignment earlier. Do you have an idea how to do this?
ther is a more serious problem I did not see, yet: while the example
makefile is obviously stupid, a real makefile includes another file
between the two assignments, so a more complete definition of foo would be
define FOO
CFLAGS := foo bar baz foo2
include OTHERFILE
$(eval $(call SET,CFLAGS))
endef
now it begins to make sense (to me), as OTHERFILE can make assignments
like CFLAGS += -DFOO etc. It would be very annoying to always have to
write $(eval ...).
What still confuses me is the following: I can write the initial
sequence and everything works fine, so how can I just transform it into
a "funtion"?
--
-ness-
_______________________________________________
Help-make mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-make
