PATTON, BILLY (SBCSI) wrote:
If you haven't tried it, I recommend it.  It has helped a lot for my
project.

Only thing I would like to see about it is to get rid of the 2 files.
reduce it to just one.

Glad you like it.

The two files were done for a reason. The gmsl file won't include __gmsl if it's already been included, and to save time the gmsl file itself is small. So if a project were to include gmsl all over the place it would be quick, whereas if gmsl had all of __gmsl in it it would be slower.

In what way does having two files cause you problems?

John.
--
John Graham-Cumming
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Home: http://www.jgc.org/
Blog: http://www.jgc.org/blog/

POPFile: http://getpopfile.org/
GNU Make Standard Library: http://gmsl.sf.net/
GNU Make Debugger: http://gmd.sf.net/
Fast, Parallel Builds: http://www.electric-cloud.com/

Sign up for my Spam and Anti-spam Newsletter
at http://www.jgc.org/


_______________________________________________
Help-make mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-make
  • gmsl PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\)
    • Re: gmsl John Graham-Cumming
    • RE: gmsl PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\)

Reply via email to