> -----Original Message----- > From: John Graham-Cumming [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of John Graham-Cumming > Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 6:55 AM > To: PATTON, BILLY (SBCSI) > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: gmsl > > > PATTON, BILLY (SBCSI) wrote: > > If you haven't tried it, I recommend it. It has helped a lot for my > > project. > > > > Only thing I would like to see about it is to get rid of > the 2 files. > > reduce it to just one. > > Glad you like it. > > The two files were done for a reason. The gmsl file won't include > __gmsl if it's already been included, and to save time the gmsl file > itself is small. So if a project were to include gmsl all over the > place it would be quick, whereas if gmsl had all of __gmsl in it it > would be slower. > > In what way does having two files cause you problems?
Not really a problem, just one more file :( Originally I tried include /some_path/gmsl It gave me a warning of something like cannot find __gmsl My vpath's are going to be complex and large before I'm finished but I don't want to add more to it than necessary. It's just a minor inconvienence, not a problem. > > John. > -- > John Graham-Cumming > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Home: http://www.jgc.org/ > Blog: http://www.jgc.org/blog/ > > POPFile: http://getpopfile.org/ > GNU Make Standard Library: http://gmsl.sf.net/ > GNU Make Debugger: http://gmd.sf.net/ > Fast, Parallel Builds: http://www.electric-cloud.com/ > > Sign up for my Spam and Anti-spam Newsletter > at http://www.jgc.org/ > _______________________________________________ Help-make mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-make
