Here's a thought: leverage the excellent work already done for the swig clisp bindings: the output produced by swig -clisp -c++ somefiletobind.i looks like it wouldn't be too difficult to munge into gst code either with gst itself or maybe with emacs elisp ....
Brad Watson ----- Original Message ---- From: Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Krishna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [email protected] Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 12:37:15 AM Subject: Re: [Help-smalltalk] Re: freeglut and opengl bindings >> I have no idea of the complexity of this task. It seems relatively >> similar to JNI, which SWIG supports, in terms of complexity... > > Oh!, I thought it is closer to the CLISP FFI (which SWIG supports too). Might be. As far as I could see, the biggest design choice is whether the C function gets the argument count and an argument vector, or rather the arguments already converted to C data types and placed into different arguments. Python for example is the former, Java is the latter. Paolo _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk ____________________________________________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://new.mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
