Brad Watson wrote:
Here's a thought: leverage the excellent work already done for the swig clisp bindings:
The idea overall is good. The problem is that CLISP's C binding is way more powerful. In particular, GNU Smalltalk has no support for enums and variables.
Also, more work (or a wrapper layer, that SWIG is very good at emitting) would be necessary to support things such as passing structures by value.
Paolo _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
