Sungjin Chun wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Speak now if you wish. :-)
>
>> Paolo
>
>
> OK, then....
>
> What about +/- for class/instance method like Objective-C? I think your
> example is rather complex for defining class/instance method. For other
> parts I actually does not have good/bad points.
>
> Bye.
This is unrelated to the scripting syntax, but I have experimented with
adding methods #-< , #@ and #@@ on Class for #subclass:,
#addInstVarName: and #addClassVarName: respectively. This allows a
ruby-like syntax:
Object -< #TreeModel
@ 'document'
@@ 'NodeTypes'!
In the end, I decided that defining #subclass:, #subclass:instVarNames:
and #subclass:instVarNames:classVarNames: was a better compromise
between my need for less typing and easy-understandability for
'conventional' Smalltalkers. Still, it has its attractions.
Mike
_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
