>> That, or maybe you can pass an arbitrary stream? > > Not maybe, definitely!
The functionality definitely has to be there. "Maybe" Joachim already had it. :-) > Also, one could implement a "tee" like functionality, i.e. > duplicating the log output on both stdout and a file. Or even > piping it (eg via nc) to a remote location. Note that however the logger should not hardcode streams either (at least in the future). For example a hypothetical SyslogLogger would prefer to log independently, without using an arbitrary stream. This however can wait. Paolo _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list help-smalltalk@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
