Also, one could implement a "tee" like functionality, i.e.
duplicating the log output on both stdout and a file. Or even
piping it (eg via nc) to a remote location.
That's something, what I would like to see in the logging interface.
No, that's something that can be useful outside logging, so it must be
implemented as new kinds of stream.
I correct myself. A multiplexing output handler can be useful in case
you want to send HTML to a file and text to stdout. This is orthogonal
to having a multiplexing stream
Paolo
_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
help-smalltalk@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
