I'm forwarding an obvious point from Stefan on memory usage, that he
wrote to me offlist:
> Only negative point, garbage is not reclaimed well so running "ruby
> mech.rb 80" twice will take 174 megabytes. I didn't check whether
> compacting between the two runs would affect the memory consumption.
That's not too bad, since the web app does not know that the
first 80 clients are gone for good. Running "mech.rb 80" twice
should (now) be only slightly better than running "mech.rb 160".
Paolo
_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
