On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 19:39:32 +0200
Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm forwarding an obvious point from Stefan on memory usage, that he
> wrote to me offlist:
>
> >> > Only negative point, garbage is not reclaimed well so running "ruby
> >> > mech.rb 80" twice will take 174 megabytes. I didn't check whether
> >> > compacting between the two runs would affect the memory consumption.
> >
> > That's not too bad, since the web app does not know that the
> > first 80 clients are gone for good. Running "mech.rb 80" twice
> > should (now) be only slightly better than running "mech.rb 160".
just ran mech.rb 80 twice: RSIZE reached 228052 kB on my box.
then mech.rb 160: RSIZE 230416
Running
gst-remote --eval "ObjectMemory compact"
after mech.rb 160 finished had an interesting effect: RSIZE 238792
s.
_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
