On Fri, 21 May 2010 05:56:13 +0200, Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> wrote: >> Any ideas on whether this was proper handling or not? I was hoping >> it would return the entire string which is what I think it should >> be doing based on reading the docs.. > > Looks like a better choice even if the docs said otherwise. > > The only small problem is that an incomplete boundary string at the > end would of course be included in the return value.
Does that mean there's something wrong with the current implementation of upToAll:? -- Rick _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
