>>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Eli> I wasn't aware that the solution didn't help. As far as I was Eli> concerned, that discussion ended with you being happy and saying Eli> "Thanks!" (with the exclam ;-), so I presumed there are no Eli> problems left, and the world just got happier by one man ;-). Sorry, I don't want either to give the impression I was not pleased. What did happen is that I've been told there is some delicate problem behind expansion of macros behind @item. I'm not aware of the implementation of makeinfo, but I can perfectly understand that there are problems. I know you want to rewrite it from scratch. So I so no point in putting pressure over you. You suggested a solution, that solution is not something I /like/, I see no point in asking for more. It's only a matter of my taste and your time. Clearly, the latter has precedence. But then, a couple of months later, I'm crunched between ot1h texi2dvi does works for reason Alpha, and otoh texi2dvi -e does work for reason Beta => your document is not processible :) :) :) Eli> I will look into this some more. Thanks, but really, I don't want to be a bug to you. *I* should adjust my code, and wait for another implementation of makeinfo. _______________________________________________ Help-texinfo mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-texinfo
