Patrice Dumas <pertu...@free.fr> writes: > I cannot reproduce that issue... We probably would need more > information, such as the actual init file for example.
It must be a problem on my side, then. Thank you for checking! > Indeed, the current way of doing syntax highlighting is not customizable > enough. There is a plan to change how this is done as discussed in the > theread started by this mail: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-texinfo/2024-11/msg00109.html That is good to know. I hope it the patch will get in and a new version of Texinfo will be released soon thereafter. :) I have one more question about syntax highlighting, if you have a minute for me. If a user writes `@example python', for instance, in their file and then uses older Texinfo, will it choke on the `python' argument, or will it ignore it? Rudy -- "It is far better to have a question that can't be answered than an answer that can't be questioned." --- Carl Sagan Rudolf Adamkovič <rud...@adamkovic.org> [he/him] http://adamkovic.org
