Correct - it's because 2.3.5 is now in your slug. We're in the process of adding 2.3.5 to our machines. By the end of the week the next slug recompile should no longer include 2.3.5.
Oren On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Kyle Bragger <[email protected]>wrote: > Hey all, > > Just pushed a deploy and updated .gems file to use rails 2.3.5 and latest > rack - noticed that slug size ballooned to ~6mb, but this is not the case > when using Rails lte 2.3.4... How come? Some difference between gems > installed by default and those that are not? Can we expect latest rails to > be (eventually) included in the default list? > > Thanks, > Kyle > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Heroku" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<heroku%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Heroku" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en.
